Forbidden Words

Saw in the Wall Street Journal 

One of the most ambitious things I’ve heard

Stanford University is trying 

To eliminate harmful words

 

Number of words in the English language

Is really hard to know 

Some say half a million

But others say that’s low

 

But say half a million words

Could potentially harm us all

Stanford finds only about 200

Words that they say appall

 

They don’t list the f-word

Or other favorites of mine

But they do indict some common words

That will almost blow your mind

 

They have a dedicated website 

No “webmaster” to be had

Any word containing “master” 

Is inherently very bad

 

The problem with the word “master”

Goes back to slavery

It really makes me wonder

What Stanford will now call an advanced degree

 

They are sensitive to the homeless 

And while the difference is not rousing

Instead of “homeless person”

They say use “person without housing”

 

Don’t say “beat a dead horse”

Even though it is just an idiom

They say it normalizes violence to animals 

At its very minimum

 

Forget the “walk-in” clinic

Call it “drop-in”, that’s OK

“Walk-in” is harmful to those who can’t

But “drop-in” you can say

 

It’s OK to take your lunch 

Just don’t use the term “brown bag”

Lest you show your racial sensitivity

Is suffering from time lag

 

Same goes for the term “white paper”

“Black mark” and many more

If the term contains a color

Its usage, best ignore

 

Don’t call someone a “guru”

Because you surely go too far

And using that term casually

Diminishes the value of those who are

 

I could go on-and-on 

With examples by the score

Google Stanford’s website

To see many, many more 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Yogi Berra Style

Downsizing

Joe Namath Selling Hearing Aids